Deleted
Group: Member
Post: 0 ( liked)
Join date: January 1970
Status:
|
|
on Feb 7, 2020 22:41:24 GMT
Posted: Feb 7, 2020 22:41:24 GMT
Hi everybody,
I wonder if you guys can provide some infos on this issue I'm having.
My ML50mm f2 has a whole lot of fungus going on, so a couple of weeks I bought a Fujinon 55mm f1.8 on eBay and an M42 adapter (being the Fujinon an M42).
So I have mounted the adapter onto the lens, and then the lens (with the adapter) to the body.
And it's all good but one thing: at f1.8 the viewfinder is bright and the focusing a breeze. Going towards f16 instead, the viewfinder gets darker and darker, until at f16 it's simply not possible to focus as the viewfinder it's too dark. Needless to say it doesn't happen with the Yashica lens, nor can I find anything about this on the Fujica.
If it can be useful, the Fujica lens has the pin for manual/auto aperture and it's correctly pressed down by the adapter.
FUN FACT: you know that little circle into where everything is in focus once it's correctly focused? One half turns black depending if you move your head a little bit towards the right or the left. This makes it impossible to focus correctly.
Any idea on why this is happening or any other person that experienced this?
Thank you very much in advance, I hope it can be useful for everybody. Enrico
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Feb 7, 2020 23:29:40 GMT
Last Edit: Feb 7, 2020 23:35:01 GMT by lumiworx
It might come down to whether you have an M/ A switch on the lens, and whether it's working as intended. Depending on which of the Fuji lenses you have, if there's a 2-position slider switch to select from ' Auto' mode to ' Manual' mode - try toggling it between the two and see if the iris blades open or close while the lens is screwed into the adapter/body. If there is no M/A switch at all, then there's no alternative than to do all the focusing and framing while the lens is wide open, and then stop-down the aperture to take the shot. The end result is that you're forced into stop-down mode with M42 lenses on C/Y bayonet mount bodies. The micro-prism focusing circle will always get darker and more difficult to see through when the aperture gets really small. That's actually what it should do, but unfortunately, when you're in stop-down mode it can be more than a little annoying. It plays better when you're in depth of field preview mode, but sucks otherwise.
|
|
Deleted
Group: Member
Post: 0 ( liked)
Join date: January 1970
Status:
|
|
on Feb 8, 2020 1:09:20 GMT
Posted: Feb 8, 2020 1:09:20 GMT
Thank you for replying first of all, I wasn't aware of this way of working of these lenses.
Is there a reason why though? I mean, even regular C/Y stop down manually but they don't produce that black ring.
What is that produces that black ring while going to smaller aperture I guess is what I'm asking?
Thank you again Enrico
|
|
Deleted
Group: Member
Post: 0 ( liked)
Join date: January 1970
Status:
|
|
on Feb 8, 2020 1:10:53 GMT
Posted: Feb 8, 2020 1:10:53 GMT
There's not an auto/manual switch btw unfortunately :/
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Feb 8, 2020 3:57:41 GMT
Last Edit: Feb 8, 2020 4:03:08 GMT by lumiworx
First... the M42 part of lens connections.
An FX-3 and any other C/Y bayonet mount camera makes use of the levers/rods/stop-pieces on the rear of the lens to control several things independantly. There's the spring-loaded aperture setting lever to actuate the iris into it's set position when the shot is triggered - then it's released once the shot is exposed. Then there's a bar/bracket/block (depending on the lens design) that tells the camera what the maximum aperture of the lens is when it's inserted into every Yashica body. Then there's a 3rd lever that corresponds to the current aperture as-set by the f/stop ring when it's turned. That lever will vary position, but stay put while it transmits it's position to the camera for exposure calculations. The spring loaded lever that auto-returns after firing is also attached to any DoF preview button that many body's have. It activates the currently chosen aperture when pressed, and springs the blades back open when released.
The M42 lenses only have one connection, and it doesn't equal any of the functions in use by a C/Y lens mounted on a C/Y body. The M42's len's spring-loaded pin is used to activate the iris blades when the shutter is triggered, and on some M42 camera bodies, there's a small 'paddle' inside the mirror box at the bottom that presses in on the pin to offer the user a DoF preview when it's preview button is pushed.
The semi-automatic functions on a M42 lens can't be physically connected to the mechanisms inside an automatic C/Y body, so there's no way to control the aperture between the two - either before, during, or after, an exposure is made.
How it makes the 'circle' dark...
The micro-prism ring around the focus dot in the ground glass sitting directly above the mirror, is actually made up of several dozen pyramidic prisms molded into that ring. The light is refracted and reflected differently when the light level decreases, and the ring starts to appear darker - and then black - when you reach the end of the aperture range and can't be stopped down any further. It's like an indicator of how much depth is dialed in when you preview the DoF. It was never intended to be an 'always-on' condition.
M42 lenses on M42 cameras will only darken the circle when you preview the DoF. The same applies to C/Y lenses on C/Y bodies. However... putting an M42 lens on a C/Y body locks the preview into it's 'on' position unless there's an M/A switch to disengage that pin from being pushed in by the adapter ring.
Unfortunately there's no workaround if your M42 lens has no M/A switch. The same thing will happen when it's adapted to any camera that uses a bayonet mount - but will accept M42 lenses when attached to mount adapters.
|
|
Group: Member
Post: 132 (14 liked)
Join date: September 2017
Status:
|
|
on Feb 8, 2020 9:07:14 GMT
Posted: Feb 8, 2020 9:07:14 GMT
The microprism and splitfield will get dark from a certain aperture value, mostly it's 5.6 - so using a "usual" lens at open aperture you will be able to focus at open aperture. If you have e.g. a 8/500 you will see the effect. This is not a bug, it's just physics. But don't ask me for details
|
|
Deleted
Group: Member
Post: 0 ( liked)
Join date: January 1970
Status:
|
|
on Feb 8, 2020 10:11:56 GMT
Posted: Feb 8, 2020 10:11:56 GMT
Thank you very much for the incredible amount of information you shared with me, it's really helping me out figure out what's happening here (as it's the first time it happened to me).
So let's say that I have a M42 body with an M42 lens. That pin gets pressed down in DOF preview and (as the aperture gets smaller) the viewfinder gets darker. When it's not pressed instead, I am changing the aperture but it's only going to close down to the correct value once I press the shutter. In the meantime (while I compose), it's wide open.
Now. I have the adapter so that the M42 works on my Yashica. That button is permanently pressed down by the adapter itself. Let's say that the adaptor wasn't pressing it down permanently. The lens would be constantly wide open during composition. Would the aperture go to the correct value once the shutter was pressed?
In other words.. If I'm able to let the pin not be pressed down, I'd be previewing wide open all the time, but once I shoot, the blades should protrude according to the aperture setting chosen on the ring.
Would that be a correct assumption?
|
|
Group: Member
Post: 132 (14 liked)
Join date: September 2017
Status:
|
|
on Feb 8, 2020 10:41:52 GMT
Last Edit: Feb 8, 2020 10:44:57 GMT by matthiasausk
> Would the aperture go to the correct value once the shutter was pressed? No, the Yashica has no mechanism to press the pin. You can see that, if you look at your M42 body - there's a re bar moved, which presses the pin, when you are pressing the release button. The YASHICA does not have this.
You can adpapt M42 to Yashica and you can use it - but not all funktions will be possible. On the other hand, the YASHICA 50mm-lenses are widely available and they are not expensive (sometimes there are offers for an FX-D with lens for 20€).
|
|
Deleted
Group: Member
Post: 0 ( liked)
Join date: January 1970
Status:
|
|
on Feb 8, 2020 15:47:29 GMT
Posted: Feb 8, 2020 15:47:29 GMT
Adapting M42 to Y/C doesn't really work as the required flange to film distance change is negative. The Y/C distance is 45.5mm while the M42 is 45.46mm. This, in theory, means you won't be able to focus on infinity though the difference is probably not going to be noticed and will be accommodated by the depth of field. But there is another potential problem. Because the adapter sits fully inside the C/Y mount and doesn't sit on the flange face, if the back of the lens is narrow enough to fit inside the C/Y mount also then the mount springs have nothing to pull against and the lens won't be firmly mounted.
|
|
Deleted
Group: Member
Post: 0 ( liked)
Join date: January 1970
Status:
|
|
on Feb 8, 2020 23:03:10 GMT
Posted: Feb 8, 2020 23:03:10 GMT
Adapting M42 to Y/C doesn't really work as the required flange to film distance change is negative. The Y/C distance is 45.5mm while the M42 is 45.46mm. This, in theory, means you won't be able to focus on infinity though the difference is probably not going to be noticed and will be accommodated by the depth of field. But there is another potential problem. Because the adapter sits fully inside the C/Y mount and doesn't sit on the flange face, if the back of the lens is narrow enough to fit inside the C/Y mount also then the mount springs have nothing to pull against and the lens won't be firmly mounted. The lens seems to be firmly attached to the body in a way that doesn't move at all. I haven't read anything about the .04mm difference... I guess I'll have to shoot a roll to see how it comes out on landscapes But thank you for the heads up on these issues, I'll keep this post updated as I try it out. It may be useful for others that want to try out non C/Y lenses!
|
|
Deleted
Group: Member
Post: 0 ( liked)
Join date: January 1970
Status:
|
|
on Feb 9, 2020 2:17:16 GMT
Posted: Feb 9, 2020 2:17:16 GMT
Adapting M42 to Y/C doesn't really work as the required flange to film distance change is negative. The Y/C distance is 45.5mm while the M42 is 45.46mm. This, in theory, means you won't be able to focus on infinity... This is an important caveat indeed. Some lenses might give you some leeway there whereas others won't indeed allow focusing to infinity. For instance, I remember encountering such issues with a Jupiter 37A mounted to a Contax body--it just never got quite sharp at infinity--so I soon gave up on this adapting business altogether.
As to Peter's second caveat, I had no problems with loose fitting lenses but rather found it a bit of a nuisance to get the M42 adapter off the C/Y mount after use.
Anyway--there are so many cool and (mostly) inexpensive M42 bodies around that I wouldn't bother with adapters in the first place anymore.
|
|
Deleted
Group: Member
Post: 0 ( liked)
Join date: January 1970
Status:
|
|
on Feb 9, 2020 22:34:19 GMT
Posted: Feb 9, 2020 22:34:19 GMT
Adapting M42 to Y/C doesn't really work as the required flange to film distance change is negative. The Y/C distance is 45.5mm while the M42 is 45.46mm. This, in theory, means you won't be able to focus on infinity... This is an important caveat indeed. Some lenses might give you some leeway there whereas others won't indeed allow focusing to infinity. For instance, I remember encountering such issues with a Jupiter 37A mounted to a Contax body--it just never got quite sharp at infinity--so I soon gave up on this adapting business altogether.
As to Peter's second caveat, I had no problems with loose fitting lenses but rather found it a bit of a nuisance to get the M42 adapter off the C/Y mount after use.
Anyway--there are so many cool and (mostly) inexpensive M42 bodies around that I wouldn't bother with adapters in the first place anymore.
In the description of the adapter it says that it focuses up to infinity so (unless it's false advertisement) it should do that, but the best test is going out and shooting. I could've easily picked up both the lens and a Fujica body for the sole price I paid for the lens, but the camera I'm using has a special value to me so I'll use it until the "wheels fall off" Fingers crossed!
|
|
Deleted
Group: Member
Post: 0 ( liked)
Join date: January 1970
Status:
|
|
on Feb 10, 2020 1:41:53 GMT
Last Edit: Feb 10, 2020 1:45:56 GMT by Deleted
Let's just do the math. Here's a list of flange focal distances, Enrico: link
As you can see, this corroborates Peter's statement. Now allow another millimeter or so for the thickness of the adapter and you will most likely have a focusing issue at infinity with many, if not most, M42 lenses.
Again, it just may work with the Fujinon if you stop it down a bit, but I would consider this solution a bit pedestrian as opposed to using C/Y on C/Y and the Fujinon (which is an outstanding performer) on, say, a Fujica STxxx. (Only my personal five cents, of course.)
Edit: I just saw on eBay that those adapters are indeed advertised with the promise that "metric scale M42 keeps its meanings due to compensation of the flange bases difference." It's beyond me though how that is supposed to be done without using extra glass.
Michael
P.S. Here is some further info on flange focal distance.
|
|
Deleted
Group: Member
Post: 0 ( liked)
Join date: January 1970
Status:
|
|
on Mar 10, 2020 17:29:53 GMT
Posted: Mar 10, 2020 17:29:53 GMT
I wanna first and foremost thank everybody that helped me (and whoever was having my same issues/doubts) understanding this M42 adapter issue As the much more expert and kind people here previously suggested, the M42 adapter DO NOT allow to focus up to infinity. I can attest this after receiving my latest scans. I can also attest how nice the Fujinon lens is (from photos focused closer than infinity)
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Mar 11, 2020 2:20:09 GMT
Last Edit: Mar 11, 2020 2:23:40 GMT by lumiworx
Sometimes it's better to know the limitations and plan for them, than to expect an outcome and never get it when you really want or need it. Keep in mind the low cost of finding a fully working companion M42 body. The Yashica TL Super and the TL X-ITS are certainly usable and built like tanks. The batteries are readily available and extremely cheap too, so you're not stuck with adapting something else to 'sort of' work. I assume one of the later Fuji ST bodies would work as good, if not better, if your version of the lens is not the later EBC types, or it has the extra 'tab' on the edge of the rear mount. That little tab might end up pushing the lens out another .5 mm or so from any non-Fuji M42 ring. I'm not a 'Fuji guy', so I'm not sure how accurate that possibility would be, and I don't have either a Fuji lens or body to use as a comparison. Here's a few lens and scene photos and remarks on using the tabbed lens... nojysweblog.blogspot.com/2015/03/fujinon-55mm-f18-m42-lens-review.html, and a specsheet and more lens photos at allphotolenses. If your lens has one, I don't know if there would be any advantage to cutting off the tab to get closer to infinity focus on a Yashica body with an adapter, but it might make a huge difference if you got another M42 body to use it on, and it kept the lens from seating all the way. You wouldn't want to end up in the same place you are now when you try a different body and that tab is what interferes with infinity focus instead of flange depth differences.
|
|