Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Aug 17, 2019 5:51:34 GMT
Posted: Aug 17, 2019 5:51:34 GMT
At some point I will be opening a new site (Vintage-Yashica.com) that will be dedicated to Yashica gear only, and I'm hoping that some of you might be able to help with a few bits and pieces... primarily about the Yashica company timeline with a few details on specific dates and chunks of its history that I'm (probably) missing. There's a temporary development site that is publicly accessible, and it already has some functional pages that are in-process. One section is a timeline page that is populated with everything I have so far. It includes a summary of notable events that span the 56 years of Yashica's operation - from the inception of the company in 1949, to the 2005 announcement on ceasing all production. There are obvious omissions (i.e., info/dates on the Contax 645), and some unknown month's for what happened in a given year, etcetera. Anything that I've missed or have gotten wrong, I'd like to edit until it's corrected and complete. I would appreciate whatever tidbits anyone would like to share. I'm also hoping that some of you - or willing friends you might know - might be able to contribute photos of Yashica branded products. Whether it's cameras, binoculars, accessories, or anything else that bears their name, I'd like to be able to provide some gallery pages with at least one 'portrait' of every camera made under the Yashica or Contax brand names. Anything similar to what's in my Gear Gallery or a shot posed in a diorama type of setting or typical product type shots would work well, and larger is preferable to smaller. The only caveat is that they be provided directly from the creator, and with permissions for their use. This won't be a for-profit site, so I can't offer any compensation if you were kind enough to make your photos available - but - I want to make sure that the creator is acknowledged and noted. Whether that's done with a watermark of your choice, or a link to your galleries or studio, I'll be happy and honored to accommodate it. The contact page on the dev site works, or a message or reply here would be great if anyone might be able to help or have questions/comments. I should note that the site will be primarily visual and share some site references to other's sites or resources. I see absolutely no reason to repeat the outstanding informational contributions made by others and the sites they provide - including several members of this board. My goal is only a graphical observation of the products and contributions made for an all-too-brief 56 years of Yashica history.
|
|
Group: Moderator
Post: 2,039 (562 liked)
Join date: April 2014
Status: Long, long time Contax and Yashica user; glad to be here and hope to contribute.
|
|
on Aug 17, 2019 17:10:11 GMT
Posted: Aug 17, 2019 17:10:11 GMT
Hi lumiworx,
Good luck with the website; I will be happy to contribute some images from time to time. Feel free to use any that I have posted here if they are suitable.
Re: the Contax 645, it was launched in Japan in late February 1999 and worldwide in April. Tragically, with the death of Contax, it only lasted 6 years but is more popular now than ever.
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 770 (71 liked)
Join date: August 2016
Status:
|
|
on Oct 2, 2019 17:03:16 GMT
Posted: Oct 2, 2019 17:03:16 GMT
FYI,
I have a copy of "The Evolution of the Japanese Camera" (from the George Eastman Museum) which has a lot of Yashica "firsts", such as the YashicaFlex S of 1954 which was the first Japanese TLR with a built-in meter.
I also have a copy of "The Collector's Guide to Japanese Cameras" which list nearly all of Yashica's early cameras -- with dates and main features.
I also have a copy of "Advanced Yashica Guide" by Tydings from 1959.
I also have lots of books on subminis covering all of Yashica's 16mm and Minox (9.25mm) cameras.
The "pictures" aren't the best, but I have lots of information and details.
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Oct 2, 2019 21:08:33 GMT
Posted: Oct 2, 2019 21:08:33 GMT
Thank you xkaes... I'm in the process of detailing all the model names and variations in a spreadsheet. At last count there was close to 365 from first to last. I have a partial list posted to the dev site, but it's far from complete. I have no doubt that I could miss several, so I'll post here when I get the updates posted in order to start plugging any holes.
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 770 (71 liked)
Join date: August 2016
Status:
|
|
on Oct 3, 2019 18:09:44 GMT
Posted: Oct 3, 2019 18:09:44 GMT
One thought about "categories". You might want to think about if, how, and where to add viewfinder cameras, half-frame cameras, and subminiature cameras. One confounder is that many cameras can legitimately be placed in more than one category. The Yashica Samurai can be placed in SLR, half-frame, AND subminiature.
And, I assume you are only going to deal with Contax cameras that have a Yashica compatible lens mount -- otherwise you are in trouble!
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Oct 3, 2019 19:58:48 GMT
Posted: Oct 3, 2019 19:58:48 GMT
One thought about "categories". You might want to think about if, how, and where to add viewfinder cameras, half-frame cameras, and subminiature cameras. One confounder is that many cameras can legitimately be placed in more than one category. The Yashica Samurai can be placed in SLR, half-frame, AND subminiature. And, I assume you are only going to deal with Contax cameras that have a Yashica compatible lens mount -- otherwise you are in trouble! Yes I'm definitely categorizing them by body type and film/sensor types as a data table with notations for 1/2 frames, etc., and sorted by manufacturing date. My 1st draft of the list is posted, but incomplete. If it was photographical or optical related gear, and manufactured by Yashica between 1948 and (essentially) 2005, it's fair game. That includes some primary accessories, binoculars, etc., that falls under their brand name - including the Contax line from the RTS onwards. I don't know if I'd consider me being 'in trouble', but it's only a hill when compared to the mountain of stuff produced by Canon or Nikon and others.
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 770 (71 liked)
Join date: August 2016
Status:
|
|
on Oct 4, 2019 14:55:54 GMT
Last Edit: Oct 4, 2019 15:39:03 GMT by xkaes
I understand the issue. One of my websites tries to deal with all of Minolta's manual focus, still film cameras and lenses: www.subclub.org/minmanI checked out your current list, and here are two things that might help. 1. The Contax 167 MT is listed as MINOX-size. 2. As to Minox gear, you have two of these listed. Here are a few more to add -- in your spare time -- from my other website that tries to list all of the subminiature cameras ever made (www.subclub.org): Yashica Atoron -- Perhaps the best known Minox offshoot is the Yashica Atoron. Yashica first developed its own submini 16mm camera -- the Y16 -- and clip-load cassette. When that attempt failed to sell, they made a camera -- the 16EE -- that used the more popular Minolta cassette. That also failed to sell well. They then attempted a submini with the Minox cassette -- the Atoron -- in 1965. It had a fixed-focus 18mm Yashinon f/2.8 lens (closes down to f/16). Shutter speeds of 1/45-1/250 and B. Built-in selenium meter. The meter provides a match-needle, programmed-type of exposure system which sets the f-stop and shutter speed in tandem -- just like on the Minolta MG. First, you dial in the film speed. Then, you point the camera at the subject. Lastly, you match the meter needle with a follower needle by turning a dial. This makes the exposure settings -- from 1/45 at f2.8 to 1/250 at f16. There are no manual settings for the aperture or the shutter speed, but the dial is marked in EV units. You can use a hand-held meter which reads out in EV (most older ones do), or simply remember that EV 12 is approximately the same as sunny-16. The meter face is marked with a "sunny day" symbol at EV12. Built-in sliding yellow filter. Other slip-on filters (80A and ND4) were available that covered the lens and the meter. Other accessories, such as a case and an AG flash unit were available. Shutter lock ring around shutter release. The Atoron came in two body styles; one was smooth, the other had a waffled surface. Many people report that this camera is a quality shooter. It did not have the push-pull film advance of the Minox, but used a film-advance tab -- a style later used on many 110 cameras. While the Atoron lens had a variable aperture (which Minox models lacked ), the Atoron lacked a focusing lens (which the Minox had). The Atoron depended on depth-of-field to get everything in focus. Revue Ministar -- Same as Yashica Atoron with a different name Photo-Porst Porst KX50 -- Same as Yashica Atoron with a different name Yashica Atoron Electro Yashica Atoron Electro T -- In 1973, Yashica added the model T. This was a standard Atoron Electro, but with a transparent top so that the user could view the mechanics of the camera. The original price was $190. Photo-Porst Porst EX55 Electronic -- Same as Yashica Atoron Electro with a different name Yashica's 16mm cameras were: Yashica Y-16 -- used special Yashica cartridge Yashica 16 EE -- used Minolta cassette Yashica 16 EE Deluxe -- used Minolta cassette
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 770 (71 liked)
Join date: August 2016
Status:
|
|
on Oct 4, 2019 16:43:44 GMT
Last Edit: Oct 4, 2019 18:05:26 GMT by xkaes
As for Yashica 110 cameras here are the ones I know about. You've only got the Electro 110 on your list. There is a good chance there are others, such as a Palmatic or Palmatic 10:
Palmatic 20 Electro 110 Electro 110 S
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 770 (71 liked)
Join date: August 2016
Status:
|
|
on Oct 4, 2019 19:26:03 GMT
Last Edit: Oct 4, 2019 20:12:20 GMT by xkaes
Just a quick look at "The Collector's Guide to Japanese Cameras" shows the Yashicaflex C appearing in TWO versions -- BOTH from 1955, not 1958. The only difference that I can discern from the limited info and pictures appears to be that the SECOND version has a flash synch connection (AKA terminal) added on the front.
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Oct 5, 2019 20:30:39 GMT
Last Edit: Oct 5, 2019 20:31:14 GMT by lumiworx
Thanks for the info xkaes ... Yes the 1st draft that I posted has several mistakes and several holes. The in-process spreadsheet I'm updating locally is far more complete, with 28 more entries and corrections as of today, but I hadn't seen any info on the 2 other 110 models and the 2nd Porst Atoron variant. I suspect that there will be multiple minor upgrades within specific models like the Yashica C versions you mentioned. It might be impossible to identify and track every one as they pop up, and rather than looking at the site as 'scholarly work' or the definitive guide, I think I'm better off in leaving out the incremental updates. I'm not planning on the site being heavy on intricate details, and geared more to a visual history of the product line as a whole.
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 770 (71 liked)
Join date: August 2016
Status:
|
|
on Oct 7, 2019 13:40:43 GMT
Posted: Oct 7, 2019 13:40:43 GMT
I understand the problem. For example, the Minolta SR-1 appeared in five (or six) variations. Most websites list just one model -- others five (or six). If a camera appears with the model name inscribed in black, while another model is inscribed in red or white, is that ONE or TWO or THREE models? Believe it or not, some people think so. When it comes to Leica cameras, so example, we can be talking about THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS -- just for the color of the inscription!!!!! The Yashica Samurai X3.0 came in three colors. Do you want pictures of them all? ?
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Oct 7, 2019 19:56:05 GMT
Posted: Oct 7, 2019 19:56:05 GMT
I understand the problem. For example, the Minolta SR-1 appeared in five (or six) variations. Most websites list just one model -- others five (or six). If a camera appears with the model name inscribed in black, while another model is inscribed in red or white, is that ONE or TWO or THREE models? Believe it or not, some people think so. When it comes to Leica cameras, so example, we can be talking about THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS -- just for the color of the inscription!!!!! In the context of what I'm planning, I'd prefer to highlight the companies progression and their innovations and 'firsts' that defined their overall ethos and vision. As a collector I'm aware that there are rarities, and that there are qualities that can equate to a product's financial value, but that's only one aspect of what they produced. The engineering and designs and accomplishments have merits that can be appreciated beyond the the monetary. An extreme parallel would be that a Rembrandt or DaVinci painting may be worth billions, but there's something within them that creates the value that every viewer can see. The Yashica Samurai X3.0 came in three colors. Do you want pictures of them all????? I don't own or have access to any of the Samurai models, but it would be great to have some photos of them. If you have one/all/any of them, it would really be terrific to see the color variations in one shot. I'm aware of their '1st' as a vertically oriented SLR and their popularity in Japan. It's a perfect example of innovative thinking that set Yashica apart from everyone else, and not being afraid to experiment outside the box.
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 770 (71 liked)
Join date: August 2016
Status:
|
|
on Oct 10, 2019 20:01:08 GMT
Posted: Oct 10, 2019 20:01:08 GMT
I get it.
"The Evolution of the Japanese Camera" that I reference earlier is basically a LONG list of all the Japanese cameras that were "FIRSTS". Many of them were Yashica cameras, for sure. I have a copy, but it might be on-line somewhere.
|
|
Group: Moderator
Post: 2,039 (562 liked)
Join date: April 2014
Status: Long, long time Contax and Yashica user; glad to be here and hope to contribute.
|
|
on Oct 11, 2019 9:59:46 GMT
Posted: Oct 11, 2019 9:59:46 GMT
Hi lumiworx,
I just had a look at the site and your cameras list which is very comprehensive - great work!
There are a few important Contax cameras missing (unless I simply missed them for which I would apologise) - the Preview (using a FX-3 shutter) and the Preview II (using a Contax S2 shutter). Also another 137MD camera - you have the NASA version listed but there is also the Swedish Air Force variant with its special trigger release. There are also the 137MD variants: the M 35 W and all the different CGCM models. Concerning the CGCMs, I don't know just how many variations there were - I have 4 which are all slightly different. I also have, as a footnote, 2 different versions of the RTS Fundus as I have at least one without the shutter button guard ring.
Like the Contax M 35 W version of the 137MD, there is a Yashica model missing: the M35 - I do not know if it was based on the FR or FRI but it was definitely a variant of the FR series in black, so unlikely to be based on the FRII.
On the Contax/Kyocera digital cameras, just a couple of observations... The Contax SL300RT (and Kyocera Finecam SL300R) is a 3MP camera, not a 4 and the Contax SL400RT was announced but not manufactured. Kyocera did produce the Finecam SL400R which would have been the basis for the Contax version but the U4R became the 4MP upgrade to the SL300RT (their common heritage is easy to see).* Unlike what has been stated on a number of websites, the lenses in the Finecam SL300R and SL400R were not Zeiss but Kyocera zooms, as indeed stated on the camera bodies, which goes a long way to explain the price differential. The Kyocera and Contax SL300R/T cameras are not simply differently badged - they are different cameras with their own lenses and focusing systems, and the Kyocera doesn't have the in-built lens shade/filter adapter found on the Contax; I would recommend that they are listed separately.
Thank you for all the hard work you are undertaking; it's definitely worth all the effort!
* I do vaguely recall one of the websites that used to post rumours about new cameras showing a photo of a pre-production sample of the U4R and identifying it as the SL400RT which may have led to the confusion over the Contax camera's existence.
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 770 (71 liked)
Join date: August 2016
Status:
|
|
on Oct 12, 2019 12:23:02 GMT
Posted: Oct 12, 2019 12:23:02 GMT
It's a mud puddle at a minimum for sure -- and some would say it's the Le Brea tar pits.
I'll throw out a rope if I can.
|
|