Group: Member
Post: 3 (0 liked)
Join date: November 2021
Status:
|
|
on Dec 1, 2021 1:53:35 GMT
Posted: Dec 1, 2021 1:53:35 GMT
Hi everyone, I have this lens but specific information can't be found. just have yashikor 5cm f2.8 not yashinon 5cm f2.8. And Yashica 5cm f2.8 earliest “91” lens found is 91003x (http://www.yashicatlr . com/YE&YF.html) not 910022. Could i help you ?
|
|
Group: Moderator
Post: 2,040 (562 liked)
Join date: April 2014
Status: Long, long time Contax and Yashica user; glad to be here and hope to contribute.
|
|
on Dec 1, 2021 9:39:09 GMT
Posted: Dec 1, 2021 9:39:09 GMT
Hi everyone, I have this lens but specific information can't be found. just have yashikor 5cm f2.8 not yashinon 5cm f2.8. And Yashica 5cm f2.8 earliest “91” lens found is 91003x (http://www.yashicatlr . com/YE&YF.html) not 910022. Could i help you ? Hello toanvo , Thank you very much for bringing this lens to our attention; it's a gap in our knowledge and I'll add it to our main listing. Your copy looks to be in excellent condition. It may be very difficult to find its optical configuration but can you kindly tell us how many aperture blades it has?
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Dec 1, 2021 17:57:30 GMT
Posted: Dec 1, 2021 17:57:30 GMT
I'll do a little digging to see whether my suspicion is correct, but at first glance it might be the slower version of a kit lens, like the one from the Yashica YF's 5cm f/1.8. It's hard to judge in your photo if the mount is Leica L39 or an M42 screw mount, so if you can provide that detail too, it would be helpful.
|
|
Group: Member
Post: 3 (0 liked)
Join date: November 2021
Status:
|
|
on Dec 2, 2021 2:18:03 GMT
Posted: Dec 2, 2021 2:18:03 GMT
I'll do a little digging to see whether my suspicion is correct, but at first glance it might be the slower version of a kit lens, like the one from the Yashica YF's 5cm f/1.8. It's hard to judge in your photo if the mount is Leica L39 or an M42 screw mount, so if you can provide that detail too, it would be helpful. Hello biggles3, lumiworxThank you for replying to my post! This lens's 6 blades, filter size: 40.5mm, leica l39 screw mount.
|
|
Group: Member
Post: 69 (2 liked)
Join date: October 2018
Status:
|
|
on Dec 2, 2021 15:12:05 GMT
Posted: Dec 2, 2021 15:12:05 GMT
that one was from Nicca, later Yashica RF. Had one in my hands but in very bad shape so i let it go. Probably Tessar opti design
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Dec 3, 2021 22:56:49 GMT
Last Edit: Dec 3, 2021 22:59:05 GMT by lumiworx
You might have to dig through some web pages to see if someone has either a brochure or catalog or an ad page to know for certain, but I think that alexx could be correct that it was sold alongside the Yashica YE and might very well be the default kit lens. It looks like the page posted by pauls could support that idea, and he's far more knowledgeable than I am on those types of small details. I've yet to get a YE model to look at the similarities of previous Nicca models that might match, but at first glance the only major differences between it and the Nicca 33 might be the shutter speed dial and some other trim detail. The 33 was, as far as I'm aware, a minor update to the 3-F to add an advance lever instead of the knob wind. Depending on where development efforts were coming from when the YE was introduced, I suppose it's possible that the 5cm f/2.8 could have been a rebadged Nicca lens, that had been given some cosmetic upgrades. The Nicca 3-F I have came with the pictured Nicca 50mm f/2.8 from the Japanese seller I got it from, and I have a suspicion that they were an original kit pairing. If Yashica decided to get them to market in rapid fashion after acquiring Nicca, they might well have reused the existing lens as a starting point. If that's the case, then the 5cm may not have been designed by Yashica and/or Tomioka, but internally it was a Nicca through and through, and was refreshed to match the new look and branding. That's speculation on my part, but I'd think it's at least plausible.
|
|
Group: Member
Post: 69 (2 liked)
Join date: October 2018
Status:
|
|
on Dec 7, 2021 18:58:22 GMT
Posted: Dec 7, 2021 18:58:22 GMT
now .. when i dig bit pics of Nicca, i see the most of them are with a Nikkor lens, no 1 with a dedicated 'Nicca(*son*)' lens. Except this 1 link Lumiwork has. Could it be that they came out with Nippon Kogaku lens at the launch and later they had some rebadged a lens to a Nicca native lens? I see also Yashinons M39 50/1.8 too .. however I have seen them on Leicas more often than on any other RF.
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Dec 8, 2021 13:33:22 GMT
Last Edit: Dec 8, 2021 13:35:52 GMT by lumiworx
With a few regular searches turning up the usual results - but with a couple of exceptions (noted below) - I figured I'd take a different approach to see what was in the marketplace as of today. This isn't going to provide anything more than anecdotal information, but it might provide some interesting details just based on quantities of a given set of search terms and whatever pairings show up in results. Basically these are run on Yahoo's auctions in Japan and anyone can do these on their own... and you can certainly do them using english brand and model names without resorting to doing some type of translation first. Looking for "Yashinon 5cm 2.8" won't show any lone lenses, and all of the results presented are fixed-lens rangefinder cameras, like the Minister series and earlier YK/YL types. Switching search terms to "Yahikor 5cm 2.8" pulls up mostly L39/LTM lenses and a few YE/YF body and lens kits. This might push the notion that the default kit lens for either or both the YE and YF may have been the 5cm Yashikor, and not the Yashinon, but that's far from a fair conclusion. Changing terms to "Yashica 5cm 2.8" seemingly combines the 2 results above and adds a few more of the same to fit the broader terms, but they're still similar in content to everything in the first 2 searches. If there have been or will be any Yashinon 5cm f/2.8 lenses listed, is anybody's guess. Doing a Google Image Search for any of those 3 sets of search terms - and this time you actually use the quotation marks for closer matches - there are a few results that don't match the expected ones. The exception is: An M42 rarity for "Yashinon 5cm 2.8" pops up on WorthPoint and on the MFlenses forum, and appears to be a preset in the same fashion as the Yashinon-R types. There's one more Flickr set of lens and test shots on that same M42 lens. As Paul noted on his YE/YF page, there were 2 variations of the Yashikor 5cm f/2.8 lenses, but there's nothing I found so far to suggest the L39/LTM Yashinon in the same size and speed had multiple versions. One of his brochure PDF's on the YE does seem to show the Yashinon 5cm 2.8 as 'a' kit lens, but I don't read Japanese to know if that's confirmed by that brochure's text.
|
|
Group: Member
Post: 69 (2 liked)
Join date: October 2018
Status:
|
|
on Dec 11, 2021 12:35:35 GMT
Posted: Dec 11, 2021 12:35:35 GMT
well thats an example of a thorough work/research Lumiworkx.
The very first hit on that Jap search page for 'Yashikor' is Yashica YE with Yahikor 5cm 2.8 on it.
Its hard to believe that Yashinon vs Yashikor anno 1950-60 was about the quality of the lens. Those cameras were low budget consumer goods. people had cameras to make simple pictures of simple things. No one new about 'Bokeh', 'IQ', 'Rendering', DOF, CA, Sharpness, .. and ppl were also much much less botanist back then so no one took pictures of flowers.
When Yashica went SLR the very first body (system) was the Pentamatic, right? Ive seen 5cm 2.8 preset in the Pentamatic mount so probably was a kit lens back then. I do have what I think the same lens but in m42 so aged after dropping Penta bayonet en going mainstream with m42, No #60****.
Anyway, my lens feels very much as a Tessar one (images out my Fuji). I would be not surprised that all of them are the very same glass but in different housings.
Trying to figure out Yashica's history / hardware is kind of approaching a rabbit hole IMO.
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Dec 11, 2021 15:38:51 GMT
Last Edit: Dec 11, 2021 15:41:22 GMT by lumiworx
... Trying to figure out Yashica's history / hardware is kind of approaching a rabbit hole IMO. That's very true and sadly it will likely get harder to find a single rabbit hole at all, as time goes by. Canon and Nikon both have their 'Museum' web pages to refer to, so at least both companies saw value in maintaining some general information tied to calendar dates. Leica and Zeiss made it easier for users and collectors by providing lots of lab and testing documentation and giving access to a a very detailed serial number database in the case of Leica/Leitz products - even those outside the photographic line. I suppose there may be other makers who may have offered similar details at some point in their history, but my interest hasn't been broad enough with other companies to know where all of those knowledge stores might be. It's unfortunate that Yashica disappeared as a major photo manufacturer when Kyocera absorbed them in the 80's and diluted their brand as time went by. I can understand why some companies don't want to share their research data and manufacturing 'secrets' until some time passes, but it's almost like they went out of their way to continually obscure the behind the scenes stuff... or at least they decided not to be as vocal about their internal workings for whatever reason. As it stands now, the web seems to be the only source left for a few shards of any real information, but it would be great if someone were to stumble onto a long-lost cache of company memorandum and production data and publish it online. [ That's a strong hint for any ex-executives from Yashica to send me a message, if they're reading this! ]
|
|
Group: Member
Post: 69 (2 liked)
Join date: October 2018
Status:
|
|
on Jan 13, 2022 21:52:22 GMT
Posted: Jan 13, 2022 21:52:22 GMT
lumiworx, I would be interested to team up and build on-line Yashica museum. All together with XXI relevant stuff
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Jan 14, 2022 1:44:48 GMT
Posted: Jan 14, 2022 1:44:48 GMT
lumiworx , I would be interested to team up and build on-line Yashica museum. All together with XXI relevant stuff I've been headed in that direction for quite some time, but haven't spent a lot of time on it recently... vnew.vintage-yashica.com The basics are there already, and I still have a ton of gear photos yet to do, but I'd be happy to have some help on what still needs doing. I'll send a PM.
|
|
Group: Member
Post: 7 (0 liked)
Join date: January 2023
Status:
|
|
on Feb 27, 2023 16:54:38 GMT
Posted: Feb 27, 2023 16:54:38 GMT
lens-db.com/yashica-yashikor-50mm-f28-ii-1959/ a 5 elements 4 groups design, 6 aperture blades, MFD 900mm lens-db.com/yashica-yashikor-50mm-f28-i-1959/ a 4 elements 3 groups design, 9 aperture blades, MFD 1067mm So two versions of what looked like one and the same lens. Although I do not have lens diagrams of these 50mm variants, it would surprise me if one isn't a Biometar/Xenotar type lens and the other a Tessar type. Like the variation in the 45mm 2.8 Yashinons on the later fixed lens rangefinders. The Yashikor 50mm 2.8 mentioned by the OP has a 6 blades aperture. The Nicca 50mm 2.8 a higher number of aperture blades.
|
|
Group: Administrator
Post: 1,370 (301 liked)
Join date: February 2017
Status: Failed treatment for L.B.A. and G.A.S,
|
|
on Mar 1, 2023 20:16:28 GMT
Last Edit: Mar 1, 2023 20:22:42 GMT by lumiworx
Well cyclope , I wanted to ponder the point a bit before posting a comment, and investigate what I had for comparison. Although I don't have any diagrams to share on the optical grouping, I think there is some possibilities to consider on whatever difference there might be in the construction. Yashica had just entered the 35mm arena, and had just acquired Nicca Optical, as well as buying all of Zunow's assets, which was slightly earlier. Both those companies already had products in the marketplace that were fit for any L39 screw lens rangefinder. These were purchased prior to Yashica releasing both the YE and YF models in December of 1959. The fixed-lens Yashica 35 rangefinders (both the f/1.9 and f/2.8) were introduced in April of 1958. There is a reasonable possibility that the first round of L39 screw mount lenses are based on stock parts from either Nicca or Zunow- or both - and were rehoused in a barrel/grip design from Yashica. The Nicca 50mm f/2.8 lens (from the '3' series Nicca cameras) has 9 blades, as does the Yashinon 5cm f/1.8 from the YF. The Yashikor lenses were arguably Yashica's more affordable line when it comes to 'family' names at the time, and it would stand to reason that at some point, a 6 blade design would perfectly suit the budget line - but- if you already have a recently acquired warehouse full of glass elements (and blade assemblies/parts)... why not use them up before scrapping them and starting fresh? That's a huge waste of capital when you've spent the cash to buy all their assets. No one would ever know who actually made the individual pieces anyway. I can certainly see them using up any existing in-house stock as a delay tactic to come out with a 100% original model design as replacements, and again, who would know about their internal parts being different to the first round... only that the new versions had fewer blades.
|
|